Reflections on the STEM program
These are the entries I wrote after each day of the program. They include my personal thoughts about what went well, what to work on for next time, and an overall review.
Reflection #1: Technology (4/16/24)
What went well?
We got attendance down successfully. The students seemed to really enjoy the activity using the sticker cutter and Lazer box. They were also all interacting with one another and making chit chat. It was a high energy class.
What to work on for next time?
There was miscommunication between Brooklyn and I during the activity because we did not go over the plan beforehand nor did we talk about how we would make it work. This led to chaos, because the students were confused on which machine they were supposed to use. Students thought that they needed to use both, and majority of the students were lined up for the Lazer box, creating an exceedingly long lineup. The lineup limited the number of students that I could help at a time, and as a result, we were not able to get everyone to use the machine. Lastly, though hosting many students at once was a pleasure, it was overwhelming and even those who were not signed up came, so the situation was messy and chaotic. For next time, Brooklyn and I decided to go over the plan so we both know exactly what our roles would be, and to restrict the attendance list to prevent the overpopulation.
Conclusion
The day was chaotic and disorganized, but we still managed to excite and intrigue the students, which was what we needed to fuel this program. If we realize and work on our mistakes for next time, I have no doubt that it will become more successful.
Reflection #2: Engineering (4/18/24)
What went well?
Today was better, starting with attendance. This time, we made sure that we only accepted the students that signed up to be in our program. The paper roller coasters were a fun and challenging activity for the students and was a good opportunity for them to bond with one another. As a bonus, I was able to fit in the kids from the first day that did not get the chance to use the Lazer box during the building time.
What to work on for next time?
I think one major issue that we need to improve upon is the method of drawing in the student’s attention. From the start, Brooklyn and I have been more forceful/aggressive when trying to get their attention, by shouting or clapping loudly. Mr. Csuka recommended we try to approach them more gently and develop a technique that does not scare the students. One other point would be instructions. The instructions at the beginning of the class were clearer than our first day, but they were not at its best either. Students were confused on what the objective was, and what rules applied to the challenge, such as if they were allowed to use more tape.
Conclusion
Overall, the day improved from last time, especially with settling down the chaos. We still need to pinpoint weaknesses in our delivery, introduction, and getting their attention.
Reflection #3: Science (4/23/24)
What went well?
I decided to take Mr. Csuka’s advice to be gentler when addressing the students. I lowered my voice and waited for the students to turn their attention onto me before I spoke. I worked around the classroom as quickly as I could and made sure to make quick adjustments to the plan when it was necessary, like when the students were confused about what to do with the distilled water, I moved the bottles to the front and helped them when they finished their rocket design. The students were high energy again, which really boosted the mood of the class.
What to work on for next time?
First, time management was a weakness today. Warning the kids that we were running out of time would have been a better idea rather than to wait for everybody to finish designing their rockets. The poor time management caused students to not be able to try assessing their rocket again or did not leave them with enough time to design a better prototype. For next time, we need to remember to give them a head’s up that we are getting closer to the end of class. Another issue that the time caused was that only a small percentage of the class completed the reflection questions on the worksheet nor drew the graph of the rocket. The instructions were a bit unclear again like last time. Students were not aware that they needed to create the rocket so that the capsule would be accessible, so they had to restart. A minor mistake that we ran into was that we forgot to bring scissors for the students to cut the paper. We figured out a solution around halfway through, by asking Mrs. Myles to lend us a box, but it was not as ideal as having them prepared would be.
Conclusion
The students were the most focused today compared to all the other days so far. They were building, engaging, and working hard. We still made mistakes, but what sets them apart from when we first started is that we made great progress, and I am so proud of us for making it this far.
Reflection #4: Math (4/25/24)
What went well?
Today was amazing because I got the student’s attention close to perfect. I was not too loud nor too soft and spoke with confidence and a clear, firm tone. I waited patiently at the front, making eye contact with the table that was still talking. Surprisingly, they quieted each other down. This was the first time I experienced the art of attention getting from students, so it felt like a great accomplishment. My teaching portion was nicely set up, and the worksheets were ready to go on time.
What to work on for next time?
The game involving math that I had planned and ran through fell apart. The goal was for the students to each solve the question in their heads and move silently to the place they solved to be correct, but instead they all followed one other to the corner and moved as a herd. I also underestimated their mathematical capabilities and made the questions too easy for them to keep interest or see as a challenge. This meant I needed to improvise during the game. However, it also backfired. As I did not prepare an answer key for the questions that I produced on the spot, I made mistakes in my calculations for my own questions. It confused the students or made them irritated, so now I remember to always have a backup plan and answer key ready to go. At certain times during the improvised game, the class got noisy and chaotic, which was hard to settle down.
Conclusion
The last day of the STEM program was bittersweet. I was sad to see the energetic, kind students leave, but relieved at the same time as I did not have to worry anymore. We got helpful feedback from the students as well. What I took away from this program was learning how to get students attention and speaking confidently in a classroom.
Process of our Passion Project!
Initial idea: Our initial idea was very similar to the final one. It was to run a class for middle and elementary students interested in STEM a few times a week in April and May.
This was how our lesson plans looked like:
Science
-Bag of change lab
-Alka-Seltzer rockets
Technology
-print keychains using Lazerbox
-print stickers using sticker cutter
Engineering
-Marble paper roller coasters
-spaghetti towers + marshmallow test
Math
-scientific notation lesson
-trigonometry lesson
Along the way, we needed to shift our plans slightly, from April-May to just doing 2 weeks in April. After reviewing our lesson plans and getting it checked by our teacher advisor (Mr. Cheng), we made slight adjustments to it as well.
Science
-Alka Seltzer rockets (we removed the bag of change because we couldn’t fit it in the schedule, but we kept it as our backup plan.)
Technology
-print keychains using Lazerbox
-print stickers using sticker cutter
Engineering
-Marble paper roller coasters (we removed the spaghetti towers as we couldn’t fit in our schedule)
Math
-Exponent laws game (Math was altered the greatest, because we decided scientific notation and trigonometry were too hard of a concept for the age range. However, we later realized our original plan was actually better suited.)
Above is the poster that we created.
Brooklyn designed and put together the poster, and I worked on some of the writing components of it.
On our poster, we included the purpose of our project, description of our project, reflections for all of the lessons, feedback from the students, the lesson plans, pictures of the activities, and examples of a sticker and keychain they made.
We did receive some wishes for our poster, most saying the information was too small to read, or that it was hard to look at.
The student’s feedback:
- Next time, be prepared with supplies (scissors)
- More time to build
- Better explanations, clear lesson in the beginning